Both Mandy and Evie are AI assistants that book interviews for recruiters. They're the closest kind of tool to compare, so the real question is how each one fits into your day.

What Evie does well

Evie is a dedicated AI recruiting coordinator. It's built to take interview scheduling off recruiters' hands, handling the coordination, reminders, and rescheduling that usually eat up the day, and connecting into your calendar and ATS. If you want a purpose-built coordinator to own that whole scheduling workflow, Evie is designed for exactly that.

Where Mandy is different

Mandy does the same core job in a different place: inside the email thread you're already in. You CC Mandy at mandy@magnatesoftware.com, and Mandy reads the conversation, offers a few times, follows up if it goes quiet, and books the call once the candidate replies, all inside Outlook and Gmail. There's no separate coordinator tool or candidate portal in the middle. The whole thing stays in the same email your candidate already opened.

The real difference for recruiters

Both save you the back and forth. The difference is where that happens.

Mandy is built to disappear into the way you already work. Nothing new to log into, nothing for the candidate to click, just a normal email thread that quietly gets a time on the calendar. If keeping scheduling inside your own conversation matters to you, that's Mandy's whole point.

When to reach for which

If you want a dedicated coordinator platform that owns interview scheduling end to end and connects into your ATS, Evie is built for that.

If you'd rather the scheduling just happen inside the emails you're already sending, without adding another tool for you or your candidate, that's where Mandy fits.

The bottom line

Evie gives you a dedicated AI coordinator for interview scheduling. Mandy keeps that same help inside your inbox, handling the back and forth so you can stay in the conversation with the candidate. Because in recruitment, the relationship is the product, and that's the part worth protecting.