An AI scheduling assistant doesn't mean ripping out whatever you're already using to manage candidates. Mandy doesn't compete with your ATS, she works alongside it. Loxo manages your pipeline. Mandy handles the scheduling conversation. Those are two different jobs, and they were never supposed to be the same tool.

Why scheduling sits unused inside your ATS

Most ATS platforms already have some kind of built in scheduling feature. But the actual back and forth with a candidate, finding a time, confirming details, still tends to happen over email anyway, regardless of what's built into the platform.

Where the real conversation happens

Your ATS is where you track the pipeline, the stages, the notes, the whole candidate record. But the moment you're actually talking to a candidate, finding a time, replying to a question, confirming details, that conversation is happening in your inbox, not inside the platform. Mandy lives exactly there. CC her into the thread and she picks up the scheduling part of whatever's already being said, without anyone having to leave the conversation to go log into something else.

Nothing about your pipeline changes

You keep using Loxo exactly the way you already do, same stages, same notes, same pipeline. Mandy isn't trying to sit on top of that or replace any part of it. She's only doing one job, the scheduling conversation that was already happening in email, and doing it without making you open another tab to get there.

Two tools, two jobs

Recruiters keep using their ATS to manage the pipeline. They CC Mandy to handle the scheduling. Those are two completely different jobs, which is exactly why this was never really a choice between one or the other.